Saturday, February 22, 2025

When Stealing Candy Becomes a Lesson in Restoring Trust: Brad Weinstein, author of Hacking School Discipline

  

From this:

https://teachergoals.com/when-stealing-candy-becomes-a-lesson-in-restoring-trust/?utm_campaign=when-stealing-candy-becomes-a-lesson-in-restoring-trust&utm_medium=social_link&utm_source=missinglettr-facebook&v=0b3b97fa6688

 

Two students stole candy from their teacher. Not just any candy—the candy. The kind of candy that teachers use to build engagement, reward effort, and inject a little joy into learning.

The teacher had bought it with his own money, excited to use it as part of a review game and classroom activities. But before that could happen, two students took matters into their own hands.

brad-weinstein-when-stealing-candy-becomes-a-lesson-in-restoring-trust-teachergoals

One distracted the teacher. The other slipped behind his desk and grabbed the stash. Later, in the next class period, the student handed it out like a sugar-fueled Robin Hood, making himself the instant favorite among his classmates.

His logic? If everyone was happy, where was the harm?

But there was a problem: it wasn’t theirs to give.

When the Teacher Found Out…

Later that day, the teacher noticed something odd—students were munching on candy. His candy. The same kind he had just bought. After putting the pieces together, he figured out what had happened.

Now, at this moment, most teachers would go one of two ways:

  1. Go straight to punishment – Write them up, give them detention, call home, and move on.
  2. Drop the whole thing – Decide it’s “just candy” and let it go.

This teacher chose a third way: restorative accountability.

Instead of focusing on what rule was broken, he focused on what harm was done. Instead of jumping straight to consequences, he asked for a restorative conversation.


Facing the Truth

When I sat down with the students, I didn’t start with shame or anger. I just asked:

“What happened?”

They admitted to it pretty quickly. But here’s the twist—they didn’t think it was a big deal.

“We gave the candy out. Everyone was happy.”

In their minds, no one was hurt. The candy was shared. The class was in a better mood. So why did it matter?

That’s when I knew we had some work to do.


From Candy to Bank Robbery

To help them see the bigger picture, I used an analogy:

“Imagine someone robs a bank, then goes out and hands the money to random people on the street. Sure, those people might be happy—but does that make it right?”

That clicked.

I asked them again: “Who was affected by what you did?”

At first, they struggled. They only saw the immediate outcome—the happy classmates. They hadn’t thought beyond that.

So, we shifted the focus to the teacher.

  • He was excited to do something fun for his students.
  • He used his own money to buy something special.
  • He lost trust in his students because of this.
  • He felt disappointed and hesitant to do fun things in the future.

That’s when it hit them. The theft wasn’t just about candy—it was about trust.

One student finally said, “So… he probably doesn’t want to do rewards anymore.”

Bingo.

mistakes-are-always-forgivable-if-one-has-the-courage-to-admit-them-bruce-lee-teachergoals

This was the moment where they had to make a choice: own up, or brush it off. True accountability isn’t just about saying sorry—it’s about having the courage to face the harm you’ve caused and take steps to repair it.


Repairing the Harm

I asked, “How do you fix this?”

At first, one student asked, “How much did the candy cost? I’ll pay him back.”

But the teacher made it clear—it wasn’t about the money.

"You can’t buy back trust. You have to earn it."

That hit them hard. They realized their mistake—not just because they got caught, but because they could see the real impact of their actions. That’s accountability.

Without being told to, they chose to apologize. Not because they were forced to. Not because they wanted to avoid punishment. But because they truly understood the harm they had caused.

And more importantly, they learned how to repair it.


Why This Matters

Could the teacher have just written them up? Sure.

Would that have taught them a lesson? Maybe.

Would it have restored trust? Not a chance.

This is why restorative discipline matters. It doesn’t mean “letting kids off easy.” It means holding them accountable in a way that actually changes behavior—not just for today, but for the future.

if-we-want-kids-to-own-their-mistakes-we-must-teach-them-how-to-repair-the-harm-they-cause-not-just-punish-them-and-hope-they-figure-it-out-brad-weinstein-teachergoals-the-ripple-effect

Real discipline isn’t about consequences. It’s about accountability, growth, and repair.

And sometimes, the best lesson starts with a stolen piece of candy.


Final Thoughts

  • Punishment teaches compliance.
  • Accountability teaches responsibility.
  • Restorative conversations build trust.

Next time a student makes a mistake, ask yourself: Do I want to punish, or do I want to teach?

Because if we want students to learn from their mistakes, we have to give them the tools to actually fix them.


More Resources

Want to explore this approach further? Check out my book, Hacking School Discipline, where we rethink student behavior by shifting from traditional punishment to restorative practices that foster relationships and accountability.




 

How To Apologize: From The In Sync Village

 From: https://www.facebook.com/theinsyncvillage

 



Excited and Engaged? From We Are Teachers

 

 From: https://www.facebook.com/WeAreTeachers


 

Saturday, February 8, 2025

Three Tips to Help Mentors Work Better With Teachers: EdWeek

 

 From: https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/three-tips-to-help-mentors-work-better-with-teachers/2025/01?utm_source=fb&utm_medium=soc&utm_campaign=edit&fbclid=IwY2xjawIUvaFleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHT4sgiYFujqBPvpelAXhJzM-tYWk52DU9dYScdwA7BvMhh7c4lzw8GZ1dw_aem_hrA32BhoRbFWQTmZgcB6mw

Teaching Profession

Three Tips to Help Mentors Work Better With Teachers

By Sarah D. Sparks — January 30, 2025  3 min read
Illustration of a diverse group of 7 professionals helping one another climb a succession of large bars with some using a ladder.

For a novice teacher, a great mentor can mean the difference between launching into a successful career and burning out in the first few years.

When teachers have effective mentors, they can improve student learning in their first year as much as those without mentors perform in their third year of teaching. But schools and districts often structure their mentoring programs in ways that can undermine these relationships, according to a new report by the nonprofit New Teacher Center, which works with school districts to develop and improve induction programs for novice teachers.

“A lot of people have moved away from this idea of a ‘buddy’ mentor to saying, we need someone who can really support our teachers with instructional focus, setting up optimal learning environments for students,” said Vera-Lisa Roberts, a program specialist with the center. “What we have found is having a full-time coach or mentor assigned to a teacher—able to meet with them on a regular basis to help them plan, observe instruction, provide feedback, analyze student learning, get to know their students—that has been the link that has helped a lot of teachers feel connected.”

“Just like you want your students to feel emotionally, intellectually, and physically safe, how do we provide that same experience for our teachers?” Roberts said.

Roberts suggested three critical but often-overlooked practices for building effective teacher mentoring.

1. Pick the right people

Administrators should have a set process and clear criteria to choose mentors, the report said. Even those with content and classroom expertise also need relational skills: knowledge about how to collaborate, and the ability to address specific teacher needs.

For example, Hawaii offers specialized mentors for teachers hired under emergency credentials to fill special education shortages. These teachers often need help understanding how to manage paperwork associated with individualized education programs and working in co-teaching environments, a common arrangement in mainstream classrooms.

2. Define roles for mentoring

Mentors need clear roles, according to Tracy Laughlin, the New Teacher Center’s communications director. Without them, mentors often get tapped to revise curriculum, administer assessments, and other tasks.

“As mentors and coaches get assigned all these other duties as well, they spend less and less time doing that [mentoring] work,” Laughlin said.

One 2012 study suggested those teachers who mentored only part time, in addition to other instructional or administrative roles, had “less connection with the goals of the program, and may be likely to do their own thing with novices.”

It’s also important, Roberts said, for the teacher, mentor, and administrator to understand their separate responsibilities, “so that we’re all informed of those same goals and we’re working in support of everything, rather than [the teacher saying], ‘Here’s the principal giving a message. Now my mentor’s giving me this message, and I’m hearing two different things.’”

3. Dedicate the time

“One of the most common mistakes districts make is when they do not provide the sanctioned time for the mentor and the mentee teacher to have those one-on-one conversations,” Roberts said.

About three-quarters of the more than 1,000 districts nationwide which the New Teacher Center works with set and protect time for mentoring and teacher collaboration as part of the normal school schedule.

“New teachers need community. Whether it be through professional learning time, office hours, coffee time, but new teachers really need to come together with one another for that support,” Roberts said. “If not, you can feel a lot of isolation. You can feel that you’re the only one who is experiencing this, when we know that that’s not the case.”